Are men necessary? (Part two) 

I can’t seem to keep up with bad behaviors by men nowadays; not all men before you lapse into cardiac arrest, but those who can’t deal with their fear of change, inadequacies, frustrations and hatreds in ways other than through the barrel of an AR-15.

Look, was it not men who flew planes into the World Trade Center on 9/11? Was it not mostly men who marched in Charlottesville in 2017 protesting the removal of the statue of a Confederate general that led to a death and scores of injuries? 

Was it men who slaughtered nine church parishioners in Charleston, South Carolina in 2015, and who gunned down six Asian women in Atlanta two years ago? Weren’t the shootings at the Uvalde’s Robb Elementary School and at the July 4th parade near Chicago committed by men?  And more recently, was it men who killed six Muslims in Albuquerque or plunged a knife into the neck of author Salam Rushdie in New York? 

Of course, you know the answers to these rhetorical questions, don’t you?

But let’s step back to the title of the piece I wrote back in April – “Are men necessary?” Like that one the one you’re now reading will garner mixed reactions along gender lines. Case in point is in response to the April one when a fellow seated near me at a cafe glanced at the headline and said, “I don’t think that an article like that is really necessary.” (The emphasis on “necessary” was his). Said his buddy, “I agree, it probably attacks men. Can’t you find something better to write about?” C’mon, really fellows, really?

Now the views from those two guys piqued my curiosity enough to find out how some women would react to the article title, so I gave it a try.

“Oh my God, of course they are,” said one of 14 church group women seated at a table at a local restaurant when I showed them the article’s headline. “Why ask that question?”

Said woman #2 who looked up from her Cesar salad, “from my experience, there are both good and bad men out there and I’ve known both.” That drew agreeing nods from others at the table. The group erupted in laughter when woman #3 said, “heck, I’m twice divorced from two losers, available and in the market for a good man if someone can get me one.”  

So how about we look at the preponderance of men – American men in particular – who are the shooters since the truth is that every time there’s a mass shooting in this country a distinct pattern and portrait emerges… the shooters are primarily men!  Have you asked yourself why?

Wrote Pulitzer Prize winning columnist Leonard Pitts about mass shooters, “Curiously enough, no one ever seem to consider, much less interrogate, the neon thread woven through it all. Meaning that pronoun, “he.” Always, “he.” We take it for granted. It hardly even registers. But maybe it should.”

Now if there’s any doubt that mostly men are doing the shooting, well, there’s this: A government study of 172 mass shootings in the US since 1966 — defined as a shooting in a public place where four or more people were killed — found that just four of the shooters were female. That’s a little more than 2 percent.

So, how on Earth do we explain this male “bang, bang, shoot em up” trend that’s become a new normal?Explains Dewey Cornell, Clinical Psychologist at the University of Virginia, “Men tend to be more violent than women because of a complex interaction of evolutionary and psycho-social factors. Men tend to be more aggressive and less inhibited by empathy.” Arguably, the answers run much deeper than that.

“So, while we debate mass shootings as a bigotry problem, a mental health problem, an access to guns problem — and make no mistake, we should — it seems past time we also began debating it as a men problem,” suggests Leonard Pitts. “That said, it is insufficient merely to indict men. Other countries have men — and for that matter, private gun ownership. Yet they don’t have the random gun violence this country does. Which suggests the question is not “What’s wrong with men?” but “What’s wrong with American men?” 

This brings us to an exploding interest in the destructive behaviors of men in books, academia and even on zoom calls.

In “A history of masculinity from patriarchy to gender justice,” by Ivan Jablonka and Nina Power’s “What do men want,” both make the case for a more generous and humane discourse capable of understanding the suffering of both men and women. 

Plus, last week’s “Call to men” zoom call explored the role of white supremacy culture’s role in the radicalization of white men and boys. In academia, the University of Kansas introduced “Angry White Male Studies” into its course offerings. So, the search for answers and solutions are on the rise and elusive.

I’ll end by opening a keg of worms, one that warrants a deep dive of its own in a future expose’ – the disparate treatment of captured shooters by race; those who are shot, beaten to a pulp  or sent in body bags to a morgue versus those who are escorted to a nearby Burger King for a Whopper, fries and diet coke. Let that sink in.

So men, don’t hide, don’t run, don’t delete.

And for Heaven’s sake…  dammit, don’t shoot!

© Terry Howard is an award-winning writer and storyteller. He is also a contributing writer with the Chattanooga News Chronicle, The American Diversity Report, The Douglas County Sentinel, Blackmarket.com, co-founder of the “26 Tiny Paint Brushes” writers’ guild, recipient of the 2019 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Leadership Award and winner of the 2022 Georgia Press Award.

Share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.